Define the site and request the catalogue
The sample is address-based and requests every dataset then offered for Queensland. The service clips the working extent around the resolved site.
Worked example · Queensland sample · generated 30 July 2026
From one site to an 80-file CAD and GIS ZIP
This is a factual walkthrough of the current downloadable sample: what was requested, what the source mapping returned, how the files support early-stage work, and where survey, title and authority checks still take over.
Real output from the live service
No customer endorsement implied
Exact ZIP available to inspect
Check this for your site
Enter a QLD, NSW or VIC address. We will carry it into the export tool and confirm exact availability before purchase.
The site question
Can a consultant assemble a practical early-stage base pack for CAD and GIS—covering mapped parcel, terrain, geology, soils, planning, hazards, heritage, easements and imagery—before commissioning survey and deeper specialist searches?
17requested datasets accounted for in the manifest
80files in the delivered archive
4vector output families: DXF, SHP, GPKG and KMZ
483 KBdownload size for this compact sample ZIP
The delivered evidence
One coordinate system, several downstream workflows
The sample uses GDA2020 / MGA Zone 56 (EPSG:7856). Compatible vector layers appear as DXF, Shapefile, GeoPackage and KMZ, while terrain and imagery use their appropriate native outputs.
- Root-level GeoPackage
- Per-layer DXF files
- Complete Shapefile sidecars
- Per-layer KMZ files
- GeoTIFF elevation raster
- DXF TIN surface
- Aerial JPG, world file and CRS metadata
- Human- and machine-readable manifests
What the source mapping returned
These counts come directly from DATASETS.txt and datasets.json in the sample—not from illustrative marketing copy.
| Dataset result | Verified sample evidence | What it supports |
|---|---|---|
| Property and access context | Included 71 cadastral features, 7 road features and 2 mapped easement features | Desktop base mapping, nearby-lot context and early review of mapped access constraints. |
| Terrain | Included 14 contour features, 500 elevation points, a GeoTIFF DEM and a 2,999-face DXF TIN | Early terrain review, CAD/GIS setup and concept-level surface context. |
| Ground context | Included 1 geology feature and 1 soil feature | Regional mapped geology and soil context for desktop screening. |
| Planning and heritage | Included 7 planning-zone features and 6 heritage-overlay features | Locating mapped planning and heritage context inside the working extent. |
| Aerial imagery | Included Georeferenced JPG, world file, CRS metadata and imagery KMZ | Visual site orientation behind vector layers in CAD, GIS and Google Earth workflows. |
| Five assessed layers | No mapped features in extent Acid sulphate soils, watercourses, flood, bushfire and geohazard | Records that the available mapping was queried and returned no features for this export extent. |
How the worked example moves through a real workflow
Choose outputs and CRS once
DXF, Shapefile, GeoPackage and KMZ were selected with GDA2020 / MGA Zone 56. Dataset-specific terrain and imagery outputs were added automatically where applicable.
Open the same evidence in the right tool
Use DXF and the TIN for CAD-oriented setup, GeoPackage or Shapefile for GIS analysis, KMZ for Google Earth review, and the GeoTIFF for raster terrain work.
Read the manifest before drawing conclusions
The manifest distinguishes included data, assessed layers with no mapped features, coverage gaps, deliberate exclusions and temporary upstream failures.
What this example can—and cannot—support
Useful for
- Starting a coordinated CAD or GIS base file
- Reviewing mapped site and surrounding context
- Scoping survey, planning, geotechnical and title enquiries
- Briefing consultants with consistent source files and CRS
- Recording which available layers returned no mapped features
Still requires confirmation
- Boundary location by a registered surveyor
- Easement rights and interests from current title documents
- Survey-grade levels and site features
- Current statutory planning and authority searches
- Site-specific engineering and professional interpretation
Important: “assessed—no features in this extent” is a result from the available mapped source, not a warranty that a hazard, constraint or interest is absent. Source currency, scale, accuracy and coverage vary.
Inspect the evidence or try your own site
The sample ZIP is the exact archive described above. For a live job, start with an address and choose the datasets and formats needed for your workflow.
Build the same kind of evidence pack for your site
Enter a QLD, NSW or VIC address, confirm availability and select the outputs that fit your CAD or GIS workflow.
Check an address →